17 Researching for an Argument

Dr. Karen Palmer

In the Evaluation section of this text, you started with your own opinion and then did some research to find evidence that you could use to add credibility and support to your evaluation. As I noted in that chapter, this is not generally how the writing process works. In this section of the text, we’ll be following the correct process. This means that you don’t form an argument until AFTER you’ve done your research. Your research should be a process of discovery–learning as much as you can about a topic so that you can make an informed argument about it.

An added benefit of this process is that you won’t have to search for quotes to support your argument. Why? Because your argument will be based on what you’ve researched, so you’ll have already gathered your evidence as you completed your research. This is perhaps more important than most students realize. In over 25 years of teaching composition, the stumbling block that creates the most aggravation for students is the inability to “find quotes” to support their argument. Invariably, these students have collected sources without reading them, so their argument is not based on anything they’ve researched. Instead of simply being able to reach back and pull in quotes that informed their ideas in the first place, they are having to search for other people who support their ideas–and sometimes those people simply don’t exist because the arguments being made are uninformed. Trust me–you will save a LOT of time and frustration by doing research the right way!

Research Process

Once you have a solid topic, you should begin researching. Research at the university level requires expertise on a topic that is build from research drawing from a wide variety of sources. The YC Library is a wonderful source of information, with articles and even whole books accessible completely online. In addition, there are many reputable websites from which credible information can be gleaned.

As you research, I want you to remember that your goal is to find out more about the social problem, your non-profit, and how they are trying to solve the problem. Many students begin research simply by looking for quotes that will support their own opinions. This method does not create good arguments! Before you begin researching, write down some questions you have about the organization you chose and the problem it solves. Do your best to find the answers to those questions in your research. Think of yourself as a detective, trying to locate all the information you can about the social problem and the non-profit organization you’ve chosen.

detective shadow
Image by Sandra Kern licensed CC BY NC SA

Possible research questions:

  • Who founded the organization?
  • What problem does it do?
  • Where is the organization located?
  • When was it founded?
  • Why was it founded?
  • Who does the problem affect?
  • What are some solutions to the problem?
  • Where else can people go for help?
  • When did the problem begin?
  • Why does the problem persist?

For YC students, the YC Library has many wonderful resources to help you with your research.

Types of Sources

Both print and internet sources may be utilized effectively in an academic argument. Depending on the situation, one type of source might be more effective than another type. For example, when discussing the Civil War, print sources will probably be the most effective. But, when discussing the whole foods movement, internet sources like the Weston Price Foundation might be more effective. The key is to find a diversity of sources, both in type and viewpoint. Diversity in your research will lead to balance in your argument, which, in turn, will lead to credibility with your audience.

Whether print or online, sources are generally sorted into three categories: Scholarly, Trade, and Popular. In the following video, an example of a popular, trade, and scholarly article is presented. Note that all three articles are shown in their online locations:

The following chart demonstrates some key characteristics of the three types of sources. While the images shared here are from print publications, note that most, if not all, of them, are also available online.

Scholarly, Trade, and Popular Sources

Scholarly

Cover of new media & society journal. Black with a graphic and white text.

Popular

Frontpage of the Washington Post with headline: Grahams to sell The Post

Trade 

Cover of Advertising Age magazine with headline: 2017, The next five years: how we get from here to there.

Scholarly sources – books and journals – disseminate research and scholarly discussions among scholars (faculty, researchers, students) in a discipline. Popular sources – magazines, newspapers, broadcast news, blogs, etc. – inform and entertain the general public. Trade publications are a combination of scholarly and popular sources that professionals in specific industries use to inform and share information about that industry with one another and those interested in the industry.

What’s the difference?

Scholarly

Journalism Practice journal cover, black with red text.

Popular

Cover of Rolling Stone magazine with the musical artist The Weeknd on the cover.

Trade

B & C trade cover with the headline Who's Got the News Mojo?

Purpose – why are they published?
To disseminate original research and scholarly discussions among scholars in a discipline. To inform and entertain about current events and popular culture. To advance a profession or industry; to inform and share info about news, trends, technologies, best practices, and products for a specific industry or profession.
Audience – who reads them?
Scholars, researchers, and students within a specific discipline. General public. Members of a profession or trade.
Author – who writes them?
Scholars, professors, researchers, and professionals.  Their credentials are usually identified. Journalists.  Author may not be named. Professionals in the field; maybe be a journalist with subject expertise.
Publisher – who publishes or produces them?
Scholarly book or journal publishers, university press, or professional association (National Communication Association – NCA) Usually commercial groups. Usually associations or commercial groups.
Content – what do they look like? Are they readable by many?
Mostly text; may have black and white figures, graphs, tables, or charts; few advertisements.

Highly specialized; includes specialized vocabulary and jargon that is readily understood by researchers in the field, but not an average reader.

Some text; glossy, color photographs; easy to read layout; lots of advertisements.

General language is used; articles may be read and understood by most people.

Some text; photographs; some graphics and charts; advertisements targeted to professionals in the field.

Specialized; includes jargon that is best understood by professionals in the field.

What are their Advantages?
  • Articles are usually evaluated by experts before publication (peer reviewed or refereed).
  • References, footnotes, or bibliographies support research and point to further research about the topic.
  • Authors describe methods and provide data to support research results.
  • Written for everyone.
  • Timely coverage of current events and popular topics.
  • Some have editors who fact check and approve the content before publication.
  • Timely coverage of industry trends.
  • Sometimes contain short bibliographies.
  • Shorter articles that are informal and provide practical tips and tricks.
What are their Disadvantages?
  • Specialized vocabulary that can be difficult for non-specialists to read.
  • Research and review process takes time; not as useful for current events and technologies.
  • Scholarly journals are expensive and may not be readily available.
  • Articles selected by editors who may know little about the topic.
  • Authors usually do not cite their sources.
  • Quick deadlines mean content review is limited; Stories may come from other sources (ex. wire services) making it difficult to review the content.
  • Published to make a profit; the line between informing and selling may be blurred.
  • Not peer reviewed, although author is usually a professional in the field.
  • Use of specialized terminology may limit readability.
  • Evidence drawn from personal experience or common knowledge not rigorous research.
  • Articles may be biased to support an industry or company.

Determining the type of sources that are appropriate for your project is important. In some cases, the context of your project will define the acceptable sources. For example, in a doctoral dissertation, typically only peer-reviewed scholarly articles are acceptable. However, in a review of a restaurant, for example, scholarly articles will not be as helpful as popular and trade sources like magazines, websites, and even social media sites. It’s important to carefully consider what type of information you need, along with the context of your project.

For your research on a non-profit, their website and even social media channels can be valuable sources of information. At the same time, scholarly articles will provide the most reliable information on the social problem.

Scholarly Sources: Databases

One form of research that is especially important for students is research in the academic databases provided by their institution’s library. Most college/university libraries subscribe to a variety of academic journals, providing students access to scholarly articles.

Academic journals and scholarly articles share the following characteristics:

  • They are written for every subject area or academic discipline.
  • They are written by professors, researchers, and other scholars
  • They disseminate research and scholarly discussions among scholars (faculty, researchers, students) in a discipline.
  • They are published by professional associations, university publishers, or other academic publishers
  • They are highly specialized and may use technical language
  • They may include graphs and tables
  • They will will cite their sources and include footnotes/endnotes and/or a bibliography/reference list.
  • Most importantly they are peer reviewed (refereed) before publication.

Scholarly articles can be located in the YC Library. In fact, the YC Databases will prove to be your most important research tool over the course of your academic career, with scholarly resources becoming more and more important as you progress in your education. With the databases, you can find credible, academic sources online right from your computer. The databases even include a citation shortcut! ProQuest is one of the most comprehensive databases. Please complete the following tutorial for ProQuest.

YC Library Tutorial for ProQuest

 

Evaluating Sources

As mentioned previously, the quality of your sources is an important factor in establishing your credibility with your audience. The following are important factors to consider when evaluating sources, particularly online sources.

  1. Relevance  Is the source relevant to your topic? For example, if I were to write an essay about creating a community garden on a college campus, a source relating the history of community gardens might be relevant, but one discussing the creation of a campus garden might be even more relevant to my topic.
  2. Reliability Reliable sources provide verifiable information. Sources that do not give citations or references are not reliable because the information given cannot be verified. In written sources, documentation is usually provided within the text and in a references page, as well. While internet sources may not have a Works Cited or References page, they often have documentation incorporated, often through including hyperlinks to the source itself.
  3. Credibility The credibility of a source can be determined in many ways. A quick way to rule out a source as credible is to check for spelling and grammatical errors. Another is to look for logical fallacies and author bias. Does the author make reasonable claims, support them with reliable evidence, and appear to treat any opposing voices with respect?
  4. Timeliness Check the date the source was published. If the topic is very current, older sources may not add useful information. If the topic is historical, older sources may help put the issue in perspective. For example, a 1997 report on elderly drivers may or may not be helpful in an argument about elderly drivers 23 years later in 2020. However, a newspaper article published during the Civil War might provide valuable information on how the war was perceived by the people experiencing it.
  5. Diversity Does the author utilize sources that all come from the same website, for example, or sources all written by the same author, or does the author’s work contain references from a wide variety of perspectives?

Check the URL!

When evaluating a website, consider the site’s URL (Uniform Resource Locator), a protocol for specifying addresses on the Internet.  The URL can tell you several things about the website:  creator, audience, purpose, and sometimes country of origin.

The URL is the address you type in to get to a website.

Analysis of url components for the url: https//sweden.selscociety/the-swedish-system-of-government/

Image credit:  http://uscupstate.libguides.com/c.php?g=257977&p=1721715

Read this URL:  https://wei.sos.wa.gov/agency/osos/en/voters/Pages/college_voters.aspx

From this web address you can tell:

  • It’s a government website (the domain suffix is .gov)
  • It’s from the state of Washington (.wa)
  • It’s domain name is for the Secretory of State Office (sos)
  • The page is in English (en)
  • The page was dynamically generated by a webserver which means it has special scripts and source code that tells a browser how to display the page or make it look in your browser. (.aspx file extension)
  • The content of the page has something to do with college voters (voters/Pages/college_voters)
  • The page is actually titled “College Voters” and it includes information for how college students living in WA State can vote.

Common Domain Suffixes in the United States

.com – Commercial

A company owns the site.  A .com can be the company’s actual Web site or it can be a Web space that a company sells to people.  Commercial sites are often difficult to evaluate because companies may include educational information on portions of their sites.  For example, the Duracell site information about sustainability and disposal.  You must decided on a case-by-case basis whether a particular site’s information outweighs its commercial / advertising agenda.

.org – Non-Profit Organization

If you use a non-profit organization’s site, think about the organization’s agenda and how it’s likely to influence the way they present information.

.edu – Educational

A .edu site is from a college or university, such as YC’s site http://yc.edu.  Usually, this means that the site has good information, but sometimes colleges and universities give Web space to faculty, staff, and students.  Remember that the individuals may or may not check their facts when they put information up on the Web.

.gov – U.S. Government

These sites are produced by some part of the United States government (federal, state, county, or city government).

.mil – U.S. Military

These sites are produced by branches of the United States military (Army, Navy, Marines, Coast Guard, etc.)

.net Internet-Related Service

This means that the site has something to do with providing internet-related service.  Local internet service providers will have .net as part of their addresses, although they might also be .com.

.k12 – K-12 School

These sites come from K-12 Schools (kindergarten through 12th grade) and can include pages created by teachers and students.

~ – Individual 

If you see a tilde (~) in the Web address, you’ll know that an individual created the page.  Make sure that the individual cites their sources if you’re considering to use the information in your research.  Note:  Universities offer Web space to their faculty, staff, and students.  If you’re studying a subject in which the individual whose page you’re looking at is a prominent researcher, it’s probably all right if she doesn’t cite outside sources when she discusses the topic of her own expertise.

Important Tips to Remember

1. If you do have a controversial topic (now or in the future), instead of searching for sources that support your point of view, try finding the most credible sources you can to prove you’re wrong. Read those sources with an open mind–with the goal to LEARN from someone else, not simply to refute their arguments. This practice will challenge you to better articulate your own position, help you better understand other perspectives, and, ultimately, make your argument stronger. Remember, there are many people who are more educated and more researched than you who disagree with you and have good reasons for doing so. Perhaps there is something important for you to consider in their position.

2. Pay attention to the language used in your sources and in your own paper. If you find that the argument is based only on emotion, on hearsay, or resorts to name calling (ie “Those who don’t agree with this position are… ignorant or uneducated or biased or right-wing or left-wing, etc), chances are the argument is not valid at all. The strongest arguments are based on verifiable facts. Make sure both your supporting sources AND your own argument are supported with strong factual evidence, rather than name-calling or generalizations.

Here’s the thing…we are all biased in some way. And that isn’t a bad thing–it means that we are individuals with unique experiences and backgrounds that have informed our values. However, knowing and acknowledging our own biases is just as important as understanding the biases present in our research. If you know you have a strong position on an issue, you can be more aware of how you evaluate arguments that both support (be sure that you aren’t accepting the argument just because you agree with it!) and counter (be sure that you aren’t dismissing the argument just because you don’t agree) your own stance.

Check Your Bias…

Here are some interesting resources for checking bias–your own and that of the source information.

Keeping a Research Journal

As you research, it’s important to keep a record of the information you find. It might not seem difficult to remember a handful of sources, but, as you continue on in your academic career, you may have a source list of 10, 20, or even more sources for a single paper. Getting in the habit of keeping track of your sources by using a research journal will help you to keep your information organized and make writing your paper much less work.

Keeping a research journal is simple. First, create a new Word document. As you do your research, take note of the correct citation of each source. Write a short summary of the source, including any important notes (ie this source contains a lot of data). Finally, write any quotes that stand out. Make sure to put the quotes in quotation marks and add the in-text citation at the end of the quote. That way, when you are writing your paper, you can easily copy and paste in a quote from a source with no worries about plagiarism!

Tip

You might find it helpful to use a table to keep track of your sources. Simply put each source in a different row of the table. Another option is to add a dividing line after each source. This helps keep sources visually separated on the page.

Here is a Sample Research Journal compiled by Dr. Palmer in class:

Sample Research Journal

Research Scavenger Hunt

Another fun option for completing your research is to do a research scavenger hunt. The following exercise allows you to take on the role of a detective, finding important information about your non-profit and the problem it solves. In addition, it requires citation information and asks that you record answers to questions. If you want to ensure that you are taking the time to read each source and that you are getting the most out of your research, this method might work better for you than the Research Journal.

Research Scavenger Hunt

 

Annotated Bibliography

Another way students are often asked to record their research is an Annotated Bibliography. In an annotated bibliography, a writer includes certain information about each source he/she plans to use in his/her paper. The Annotated Bibliography should include the following:

  • The correct citation of the source as it would appear in the Works Cited page
  • A summary of the source
  • An evaluation of the source–this includes information about how the source adds to the author’s understanding of the topic and/or how the author might utilize this source in the final paper, as well as thoughts about the reliability, credibility, etc of the source.

Watch this short video for a quick overview of what an annotated bibliography is and how to correctly format one (note: you do not need to download the template):

Assignment: Annotated Bibliography

For this assignment, you will be going on a hunt for more information about your non profit and the problem it solves. Your job is to learn something new about your organization–you are NOT simply trying to find sources that support your point of view. Find at least five sources about your topic. Your sources should include the following:

  1. an article from the YC Library database,
  2. a website,
  3. a blog or an interview,
  4. an article from a magazine or newspaper (can be located online),
  5. and a video.

Note that a website can only be used ONE TIME! In other words, you cannot use the same website to meet the requirements for a blog, a website, and a video.

A good strategy for research is to try to find sources that help you flesh out each of the parts of your paper. Look for information on the problem, the non-profit, and the solution. For instance, if I had chosen the Marine Conservation Alliance as my non-profit, my sources might include the following:

1. The MCA official Website: http://marineconservationalliance.org/

2. This Ted Talk video by Dan Barber discussing the problem and how a business is solving the problem: https://www.ted.com/talks/dan_barber_how_i_fell_in_love_with_a_fish?language=en 

3. This online article explaining the issue and discussing some other non-profits working to solve it: https://foodtank.com/news/2017/10/sustainable-fisheries-list/

4. This interview: https://www.worldfishing.net/news101/Comment/interviews/heralding-a-new-era-of-transparency-and-engagement 

5. And an article from the YC library databases on Fish Farming.

Here’s a template you can use for your Bibliography:

Annotated Bibliography Template

Your Name

ENG 101

Professor Name

10/25/2023

Organization: Annotated Bibliography

Website

Citation: Editor, author, or compiler name (if available). Name of Site. Name of institution/organization affiliated with the site (sponsor or publisher), date of resource creation (if available), URL, DOI, or permalink. Date of access.

Summary: Up to one paragraph.

Database Article

Citation (copy and paste from database using the ‘cite’ button)

Summary

Video

Citation: Author’s Name (only if different from uploader). “Title of Video.” YouTube, uploaded by, date of publication, YouTube link. Date you accessed.

Summary

Interview 

Citation: use appropriate citation method

Summary

Article

Author. “Title.” Name of publication/website.  Date published, url. Date accessed.

Summary.

You may also use one of the following templates. Please be sure to follow instructions from your professor–many professors require that students use Word.

  • Google Template (make a copy)
  • Word Template (Don’t include topic/thesis–just the heading. Note that this template does not include the required sources headings)

Here’s a sample Annotated Bibliography based on a non-profit called Rainbow Acres. Please note that this is a less formal version than demonstrated in the video above. This example also includes mini-headings in bold so that the instructor can see at a glance that the bibliography includes the five types of sources required.

Sample Annotated Bibliography

 


Annotation:

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Researching for an Argument Copyright © 2024 by Dr. Karen Palmer is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.